Using Voice and Perspective in Academic Writing

Master the art of balancing active vs passive voice and first- vs third-person perspectives in your academic writing to ensure your work is clear, engaging, and appropriate to your audience.
Academic Services
Academic Editing & Proofreading, Academic Writing

Have you ever wondered whether your academic writing could meet rigorous standards without feeling outdated or dull? Striking the right balance between being clear, precise, and engaging is tough—and it’s easy to fall back on overly formal prose.

These tips will help you navigate that balance and master a key tool in your writer’s toolkit: voice and perspective. Learn how to use them skillfully to communicate your ideas within the norms and standards of academic writing while keeping your readers interested.

Active or Passive Voice?

Why Voice Matters

The choice between active and passive voice can significantly influence how your message is perceived. Active constructions—such as “We analysed the data”—offer immediate clarity by identifying the actor, while passive constructions—“The data were analysed”—place the emphasis on the process or result. Historically, fields like STEM have leaned towards passive voice to maintain objectivity. However, contemporary style guides advocate a more balanced approach, suggesting that overuse of either voice may hinder readability.

When to Use Active Voice

Active voice is particularly effective in situations where clarity and immediacy are paramount. Consider these examples:

  • Presenting Key Findings: “We discovered that the catalyst reduced emissions by 20%.” This statement directly attributes the discovery, leaving no room for ambiguity.
  • Explaining Methodology: “We conducted a double-blind study.” The straightforward nature of active voice enhances the transparency of your methods.
  • Highlighting Original Contributions: When your unique perspective is essential, phrases like “I propose a new framework” clearly assert authorship and originality.

When to Use Passive Voice

There are scenarios where passive voice proves advantageous:

  • Emphasising Processes: “The variables were measured using calibrated sensors.” Here, the focus shifts to the procedure rather than the individual performing it.
  • Maintaining Objectivity: In sections such as Methods or Results, passive constructions can help maintain an impartial tone.
  • Avoiding Over-Personalisation: If your writing risks becoming too self-referential, interspersing passive constructions can maintain a balanced narrative.

Balancing Both Approaches

Ultimately, the key is to strike a harmonious balance that reflects both the disciplinary norms and the specific context of your work. Consider your target audience and the requirements of your chosen journal, and adjust your voice accordingly. A thoughtful blend of active and passive voice can enhance clarity while preserving a formal tone.

Polish your academic writing skills with these essential resources and style guides.

View the list

First vs. Third Person Perspective

Understanding Disciplinary Norms

The decision to use first or third person varies across academic disciplines. In the humanities and social sciences, first-person pronouns such as “I” or “we” are often embraced to highlight personal insight and theoretical interpretation. Conversely, the sciences and technical fields traditionally favour the third person to underscore objectivity. When in doubt, reviewing recent publications in your discipline or consulting your institution’s guidelines can provide valuable direction.

Guidelines and Best Practices

Irrespective of discipline, adhering to the recommended style guides—be it APA, MLA, Chicago, or those specific to your target journal—is essential. While some guidelines discourage the use of first-person pronouns, many modern publications accept “we” to avoid cumbersome passive constructions. The key is to employ first-person sparingly, ensuring that it serves to clarify your unique contribution without detracting from the research itself.

Practical Examples and Common Pitfalls

 

  • Awkward Third Person: “One observes a marked decrease in the error rate” may come across as stilted and impersonal.
  • Streamlined First Person: “I observed a decrease in error rates” or “We discovered significant correlations” offer a more direct and engaging account.
  • Striking a Balance: Overuse of personal pronouns can distract from the core findings. Instead, reserve their use for moments when your individual input is critical.

Universal Best Practices for Academic Writing

Regardless of your field, some principles of academic writing remain constant:

  • Prioritise Clarity: Always choose the structure—active or passive—that best elucidates your point.
  • Maintain Formality: Even when using first-person pronouns, ensure your language remains polished and professional.
  • Adhere to Guidelines: Institutional or journal-specific rules should always take precedence over general advice.
  • Balance Engagement with Objectivity: A judicious mix of active and passive voice, as well as first- and third-person perspectives, can maintain both credibility and readability.

Finding Your Unique Academic Voice

Your academic voice is more than a grammatical preference—it is a strategic tool that shapes how your research is received. By carefully balancing active and passive constructions alongside first- and third-person perspectives, you can produce work that is both authoritative and engaging. As scholarly conventions continue to evolve, remain flexible and informed by your discipline’s standards. Experiment with these techniques and consult trusted resources to refine your style. In doing so, you’ll not only meet formal expectations but also craft papers that resonate with your readers.

Get Personalised Academic Support

Whether you need a quick polish or comprehensive coaching, our Academic Support Services help you strike the perfect balance in voice, style, and substance.

Explore our services

You May Also Like